The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with modified incision placement of proximal femur antirotational intramedullary nail

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.3.16

PDF(3344 KB)

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3) : 333-337. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.3.16

The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with modified incision placement of proximal femur antirotational intramedullary nail

Chen Liang¹, Hu Dingxiang¹, Duan Chao¹, Ma Chenxi ¹, Deng Chuanfen², Liu Min³*

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective　To explore the efficacy of modified incision placement PFNA for patients with intertrochanteric fracture.　Methods　The study included 86 patients with intertrochanteric fracture who underwent closed reduction and PFNA internal fixation from January 2017 to December 2018. There were 48 patients with modified minor incision surgery; 38 patients with standard incision surgery.The length of operation, C-arm fluoroscopy times, length of proximal incision, operative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and 1 year after operation were recorded and evaluated using Harris score and Charnley score in both groups. Results ① There were no significant differences in the gender composition and mean age of the included patients (P>0.05); ② The length of hospital stay between the two groups was not significantly different (P>0.05); ③ The modified incision group had a shorter incision length and operation time, blood loss and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were reduced, and the Harris score and Charnley score were higher than those of the standard incision group at 1-year postoperative follow-up. Conclusions The operation of PFNA implantation under the improved incision has the advantages of positioning without fluoroscopy, reduced operation time, smaller surgical incision, less bleeding, and less surgical damage.

Key words

Intertrochanteric fracture of femur / / / Improved incision / / / Minimally invasive / / / Proximal femoral intramedullary nail

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Chen Liang, Hu Dingxiang, Duan Chao, Ma Chenxi , Deng Chuanfen, Liu Min. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures with modified incision placement of proximal femur antirotational intramedullary nail[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2022, 40(3): 333-337 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.3.16

References

[1] Chang SM, Hou ZY, Hu SJ, et al. Intertrochanteric femur fracture treatment in Asia: what we know and what the world can learn[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2020, 51(2): 189-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.11.011.
[2] Ma JX, Kuang MJ, Fan ZR, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes with InterTan vs Gamma nail or PFNA in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1): 15962. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16315-3.
[3] 李建涛, 张里程, 唐佩福. 股骨粗隆间骨折治疗理念与内固定器械的发展概述[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2019, 33(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201809076.
[4] Ma JX, Wang J, Xu WG, et al. Biomechanical outcome of proximal femoral nail antirotation is superior to proximal femoral locking compression plate for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures: a biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2015, 49(4): 426-432. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0306.
[5] Yu WG, Zhang XC, Zhu XF, et al. Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2016, 17: 222. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1079-7.
[6] 侯宇, 姚琦, 张亘瑷, 等. 第3代Gamma钉拉力螺钉钉尾距股骨外侧皮质距离与术后拉力螺钉移位或切出关系研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2018, 32(1): 40-44. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201709009.
[7] Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, et al. Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures-a review[J]. Injury, 2012, 43(6): 686-693. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury. 2011. 05. 031.
[8] Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1972, 54(1): 61-76. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_17.
[9] Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(8): 1458-1460. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015.
[10] 邱贵兴, 裴福兴, 胡侦明, 等. 中国骨质疏松性骨折诊疗指南[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2015, 8(5): 371-375. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2015.05-01.
[11] Sambandam SN, Chandrasekharan J, Mounasamy V, et al. Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2016, 26(4): 339-353. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1757-z.
[12]Baek SH, Baek S, Won H, et al. Does proximal femoral nail antirotation achieve better outcome than previous-generation proximal femoral nail[J]? World J Orthop, 2020, 11(11): 483-491. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483.
[13] Nikoloski AN, Osbrough AL, Yates PJ. Should the tip-apex distance (TAD) rule be modified for the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)? A retrospective study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2013, 8(1): 35. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-35.
[14] Kumbaraci M, Karapinar L, Incesu M, et al. Treatment of bilateral simultaneous subtrochanteric femur fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in a patient with osteopetrosis: case report and review of the literature[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2013, 18(3): 486-489. DOI: 10.1007/s00776-011-0170-z.
[15] Wang Q, Gu XH, Li X, et al. Management of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures by proximal femoral nail anti-rotation[J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(6): 1173-1179. DOI: 10.1111/os.12579.
[16] 李建赤, 刘岗, 薛小华, 等. 老年人股骨转子间骨折PFNA和DHS内固定术疗效的临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 571-575. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.05.019.
[17] 袁晓明, 姚琦, 倪杰, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的荟萃分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2014, 94(11): 836-839. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2014.11.009.
[18] Hsu CE, Chiu YC, Tsai SH, et al. Trochanter stabilising plate improves treatment outcomes in AO/OTA 31-A2 intertrochanteric fractures with critical thin femoral lateral walls[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(6): 1047-1053. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.03.007.
[19] 张世民, 马卓, 杜守超, 等. 股骨近端外侧壁的解剖学研究及其对转子间骨折内固定的意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 39-42. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.01.011.
[20] 张英琪, 张世民, 熊文峰, 等. 股骨近端外侧壁的骨折特征地图研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(2): 121-125. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.02.001.
[21] 林周胜, 江成, 夏雄智, 等. 老年骨质疏松性转子间骨折PFNA内固定术后股骨近端几何结构的变化[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(4): 472-474. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.01.011.
[22] Zeng C, Wang YR, Wei J, et al. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation or dynamic hip screw systems: a meta-analysis[J]. J Int Med Res, 2012, 40(3): 839-851. DOI: 10.1177/147323001204000302.
[23] Radaideh AM, Qudah HA, Audat ZA, et al. Functional and Radiological Results of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Unstable Pertrochanteric Fractures[J]. J Clin Med, 2018, 7(4): 78. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7040078.
[24] Jiamton C, Boernert K, Babst R, et al. The nail–shaft-axis of the of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) is an important prognostic factor in the operative treatment of intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2018, 138(3): 339-349. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2857-x.
[25] Sahin S, Ertürer E, Oztürk I, et al. Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of nstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures[J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2010, 44(2): 127-134. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2010.2237.
[26] Parker MJ, Bowers TR, Pryor GA. Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012, 94(3): 391-397. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B3.28406.
[27] 梁昌详, 郑晓青, 昌耘冰, 等. 精确定位防旋髓内钉置入治疗股骨转子间骨折[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(17): 2685-2690. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2014.17.011.
[28] 吴献民, 李广峰, 何国云, 等. 网格定位器辅助植入防旋股骨近端髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2019, 33(6): 666-670. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201808117.