Measurement of applied anatomical parameters of sacroiliac screw passing the back of sacrum by CT digital reconstruction technique

Li Dong, Ma Yunhong, Zhou Jinhua, Wang Xinming, Xi Bin, Yin Qudong, Jiang Yan

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 17-21.

PDF(2727 KB)
PDF(2727 KB)
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 17-21. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.1.04

Measurement of applied anatomical parameters of sacroiliac screw passing the back of sacrum by CT digital reconstruction technique

  • Li Dong1#, Ma Yunhong2#, Zhou Jinhua3, Wang Xinming1, Xi Bin4, Yin Qudong2, Jiang Yan4*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective    To measure the anatomical parameters of the innovative sacroiliac screw-sacroiliac screw passing the back of sacrum(SISPTBOS), so as to provide basis for clinical application.    Methods     The 3D CT reconstruction images of 32 cases of normal adult pelvis were analyzed to observe the range of SISPTBOS channel, by simulating placement of SISPTBOS, measuring the anatomical parameters including the length of the screw channel(L), the distance between the insertion point and the center of superior articular process of S1(M1), the distance between the exit point and the superior- posterior border of actabulium(M2), the anteversion angle between the central axis and the line parallel to the upper endplate of S1(e), the outward angle(f), the safety angle in the sagittal plane(a), the safety angle in the coronal plane(b), the minimum diameter in the sagittal plane(d1) and the minimum diameter in the coronal plane(d2).   Results    The medial boundary of the screw canal was the inner wall of the arcuate line. The lateral boundary was the posterior-lateral walls of the spinal canal of S1 and the ilium, the lower boundary was the line between the sacral hole of S1 and the ischial notch, the upper boundary was the sacral slope, surface of sacroiliac joint, and the bottom of the true pelvis. L was (11.90±1.62) cm, M1 was ((2.07±1.40) mm, M2 was (4.78±2.57) mm, e was (57.97±4.28) °, f was (54.89±5.13) °, a was (11.45±2.73) °, b was (7.46±1.34) °, d1 was (8.57±0.99)mm and d2 was (6.75±0.84) mm. There were significant differences in the anteversion angle between the central axis and the line parallel to the upper endplate of S1 (e) and the outward angle(f) between males and females (P<0.05).    Conclusions    Implanting of the SISPTBOS is feasible and safe, which may be selected by using screws with a diameter of 5.0 to 6.0 mm and a length of 9 to10 cm.

Key words

Sacroiliac joint;  /   / Sacroiliac screw;  /   / Computed tomograph;  /   / Anatomy

Cite this article

Download Citations
Li Dong, Ma Yunhong, Zhou Jinhua, Wang Xinming, Xi Bin, Yin Qudong, Jiang Yan. Measurement of applied anatomical parameters of sacroiliac screw passing the back of sacrum by CT digital reconstruction technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2022, 40(1): 17-21 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.1.04

References

[1]  潘进社, 张英泽, 郑占乐, 等. 应用入口位和出口位X线监视下经皮微创螺钉内固定治疗骶髂关节骨折脱位[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2008, 16(18): 1430-1431. DOI: CNKI: SUN:ZJXS.0.2008-18-026.
[2] Osterhoff G, Ossendorf C, Wanner GA, et al. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation in S1 and S2 for posterior pelvic ring injuries: technique and perioperative complications[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surgery, 2011, 131(6): 809-813. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1230-0.
[3]  Grossterlinden L, Rueger J, Catala-Lehnen P, et al. Factors influencing the accuracy of iliosacral screw placement in trauma patients[J]. Int Orthop, 2011, 35(9): 1391-1396. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1092-7.
[4]  苏永刚, 王茂颖, 王满宜. 基于CT图像解剖学测量和数字重建透视的经皮骶髂螺钉固定术中透视方法研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2012, 14(5): 405-409. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2012.05.009.
[5]  陈红卫, 王子阳, 黄洪斌, 等. 经皮重建钢板与经皮骶髂螺钉固定治疗Tile C型骨盆后环骨折[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2009, 29(11): 1019-1022. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2009.11.006.
[6] Khaled SA, Soliman O, Wahed MA, et al. Functional outcome of unstable pelvic ring injuries after iliosacral screw fixation: single versus two screw fixation[J]. Eur J Ttauma Emerg Surg, 2015, 41(4): 387-392. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-014-0456-x.
[7] Elzohairy MM, Salama AM. Open reduction internal fixation versus percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation for unstable posterior pelvic ring disruptions[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2017, 103(2): 223-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.12.002.
[8]  Collinge CA, Crist BD. Combined percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation with sacroplasty using resorbable calcium phosphate cement for osteoporotic pelvic fractures requiring surgery[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(6): e217-e222. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000520.
[9]  潘志军, 洪华兴, 黄宗坚, 等. 骶髂关节螺钉固定的钉道参数应用解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2004, 22(2): 125-128. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-165X.2004.02.005.
[10] 魏巍, 王晖, 夏志勇, 等. 骶髂螺钉治疗骶髂关节损伤时钉道参数的CT测量[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 39(3): 293-296. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2018.03.011.
[11] 郑占乐, 张晓然, 于贤, 等. X线引导下双针定位器置入骶髂螺钉的初步临床研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2014, 35(7): 842-843, 869. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2014.07.037.
[12] 张景僚, 顾立强, 张美超, 等. 骶髂关节脱位钉板内固定与关节拉力螺钉内固定两种置入方法的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(13): 2329-2332. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8225.2010.13.013.
PDF(2727 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/