Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.016

PDF(1284 KB)

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3) : 336-341. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.016

Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury

Liu Weile¹, Zheng Shaowei¹, Li Xu²， Wang Yin², Shi Zhanjun³, Sun Chunhan ¹, Xie Fujie¹， Zhong Haobo¹

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective　To compare the effect of double-row suture bridge " without knot" and "with knot" repair technology under the arthroscopy for the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury.　Methods　Sixty-nine elderly patients with rotator cuff injury admitted to Huizhou people’s Hospital from January 2016 to February 2019 were prospectively collected and 35 cases were randomly asigned into a control groups (articular endoscope double-row suture bridge "with knot" repair technique ) and 34 cases were into an observation group (arthroscope double-row suture bridge "without knot" repair technique). The joint function and the retear rate with different degree of injury were compared between the two groups 3 months and 6 months after operation.　Results　There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristic, UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores between the observation group and the control group before treatment (P> 0.05). However, at 6 months after operation, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores of the two groups were better than those before operation (P<0.001). There was no significant differences in the UCLA、ASES、Constant-Murley scores between the observation group and control group after operation from all the patients in the whole group and light-moderate tears degree subgroups. Among the subgroups with heavy-large tears, the UCLA, ASES, and Constant-Murley scores of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant differences in the antexion of the shoulder joint and the degree of external rotation of the two groups after operation (P＞0.05). The incidence of re-tearing in the control group was higher than that in the observation group (17.1% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.051). Conclusions Both double-row suture bridge "with knot" and "without knot" repairs are effective and feasible in elderly patients with rotator cuff injury. For patients with heavy-large tears degree, the "without-knot" technique may be more advantageous.

Key words

The elderly;　Rotator cuff injury;　Suture bridge technique;　Shoulder joint / arthroscope

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

Liu Weile, Zheng Shaowei, Li Xu, Wang Yin, Shi Zhanjun, Sun Chunhan, Xie Fujie, Zhong Haobo. Comparative study of arthroscopic double row suture bridge " without knot" repair technology in the treatment of elderly rotator cuff injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2021, 39(3): 336-341 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.016

References

[1] 张辉, 庄万强, 骆勇刚, 等. 关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究[J].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 5(6):337-341. DOI：
10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-0263.2019.06.007.
[2] 黄彪, 彭小英, 王新亮, 等. 肩关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的效果[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2019, 40(8):946-947. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2019.08.009.
[3] 杨建水.肩袖修复术后再撕裂相关因素的研究[J].医学信息,2020,33(1):46-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2020.01.016.
[4] Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2012, 31(4): 589-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2012.07.001.
[5] Bennett WF. Arthroscopic repair of full thickness supraspinatus tears (Small to medium): a prospective study with 2 to 4 year follow up [J]. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(3): 249-256. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2003.50083.
[6] Deprés-Tremblay G, Chevrier A , Snow M , et al. Rotator cuff repair: a review of surgical techniques, animal models, and new technologies under development[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(12):2078-2085. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.009.
[7] 黄成龙, 潘界恩, 蔡震海, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗老年创伤性肩关节脱位合并肩袖损伤的疗效评价[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2016, 22(6): 35-39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1989.2016.06.010.
[8] 傅仰攀, 黄长明, 尹宗生. 全肩关节镜与关节镜辅助治疗肩袖损伤的比较 [J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(20): 1839-1843. DOI: 10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2016.20.04.
[9] 刘少华, 李宏, 孙亚英, 等. 关节镜下单排与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖撕裂—临床与核磁共振评价 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2017, 36(2): 97-100, 105. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2017.02.001.
[10]陈伟雄, 薛厚军, 刘青华, 等. 关节镜下不同修补术治疗肩袖损伤的临床效果[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(01):73-77. DOI：10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.015.
[11]Shon MS , Koh KH , Lim TK , et al. Arthroscopic partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears: preoperative factors associated with outcome deterioration over 2 years[J]. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015, 43(8):1965-1975. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515585122.
[12]郑鸿, 赵甲军, 谭宏昌, 等. 关节镜下缝线桥与传统双排技术修复全层肩袖撕裂的比较 [J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(9):806-809. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2017.09.013.
[13]魏俊成, 颜世昌, 彭俊洋,等. 关节镜下单纯双排缝合与缝合桥技术修复肩袖损伤的临床观察[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2018, 41(9):833-836. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2018.09.017.
[14]潘界恩, 陈刚, 黄成龙, 等. 改良压配式双排缝合技术与传统单双排缝合技术在肩袖大型撕裂修补中的生物力学比较[C]// 2015年浙江省骨科学学术年会. 2015.
[15]周勇伟, 杨骐宁, 曹扬. 关节镜单排与双排缝线桥技术修复年轻中型肩袖撕裂患者的疗效[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2018, 20(7):1075-1077. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1372.2018.07.037.
[16] Warth RJ, Greenspoon JA, Bhatia S, et al. Arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair using a knotless, interconnected technique[J]. Oper Tech Orthop, 2015, 25(1): 43⁃48. DOI: 10.1053/j.oto.2014.10.003.
[17] ] Shin SJ, Kook SH, Rao N, et al. Clinical outcomes of modified Mason-Allen single-row repair for bursal-sided partialthickness rotator cuff tear: Comparison with the double-rowsuture- bridge technique[J]. Am J Sport Med, 2015, 43(8): 1976-1982. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515587718.
[18] Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot- tying transosseous- equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(1): 7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.07.004.
[19] 裴杰, 王青. 肩袖撕裂双排缝合技术与缝线桥技术的疗效对比分析 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 36(1):9-13, 20. DOI：10.16038/j.1000-6710.2017.01.002.
[20] Warth RJ, Dornan G J, James E W, et al. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears with and without platelet-rich product supplementation: a meta-analysis and meta-regression[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(2):306-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.09.007.
[21] Carr AJ, Cooper CD, Campbell MK, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial][J]. Health Technol Assess, 2015, 19(80):1-217. DOI: 10.3310/hta19800.