Study on validity of 3D surface structured light scanner for measuring hand morphology

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.06.007

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6) : 657-660. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.06.007

YU Fang¹，CHENG Zhi-quan²，TANG Ju-yu¹，SUI Xin-lei¹，CAO Zhe-ming¹，PAN Ding¹，LI Hui²

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective　To develop a 3D hand scanning system based on structural light and to evaluate the validity of hand morphological modes.　Methods　By scanning the left hand of 5 volunteers with the self-designed 3D scanning system of structural light, the 3D images on the volar side and the dorsal side were spliced, encapsulated, filled and smoothed. Then the fingers’ length, joint circumference and width of 3D models of the hand were measured, and the measured results were compared with those obtained by the direct measurement method.　Results　The scanning time of 3D scanning system for structural light was 1 second, and the shape of the 3D hand models was realistic and the skin texture was fine. Among of the 28 measurement indexes, the difference between the dorsal length of the index and long fingers and the DIP joint circumference of the index finger were statistically significant (but all were less than 2.0 mm), and the difference between other measurement indexes was not statistically significant (all were within 1.0 mm).　Conclusions　The self-made 3D scanning system of structural light can reconstruct the soft tissue models of the hand quickly, and the 3D hand morphological models have high validity.

Key words

Structural light scanner / 　Hand model / 　Direct measurement / 　Validity

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

YU Fang, CHENG Zhi-quan, TANG Ju-yu, SUI Xin-lei, CAO Zhe-ming, PAN Ding, LI Hui. Study on validity of 3D surface structured light scanner for measuring hand morphology[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2020, 38(6): 657-660 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.06.007

References

[1] 刘璠, 侍德, 陆守曾, 等. 手之分型及其临床意义[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 1994, 32(2): 73-77.
[2] 杨莉, 王宇, 段云峰, 等. 云南省大理地区白族青年手指长度的测量[J]. 解剖学杂志, 2015, 38(1):76-78.
[3] Jee SC, Yun MH. An anthropometric survey of Korean hand and hand shape types[J]. Int J Ind Ergonom, 2016, 53(1):10-11.
[4] 王凌宇, 田光磊, 王满宜. CT三维重建技术估算再造手指整形皮瓣形状的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(3):301-304.
[5] 陈冬生, 陈隆福, 李敬矿, 等. 适用于计算机三维重建的手标本灌注方法[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2010, 26(6):376-379.
[6] 熊耀阳, 焦婷, 张富强. 结构光三维测量轮廓技术及快速成型技术在颌面赝复中的应用[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复杂志, 2008, 12(9):1705-1708.
[7] 周冰. 外鼻缺损修复的个性化三维仿真设计及快速成型研究[D]. 第四军医大学, 2008.
[8] 吴明磊, 吴壮志, 刘何庆, 等. 基于三维扫描的人体头面部测量方法研究[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志, 2015, 26(3):208-216.
[9] 赵一姣, 熊玉雪, 杨慧芳, 等. 2种三维颜面部扫描仪测量精度的定量评价[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(1):37-42.
[10]Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, et al. Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images[J]. Cleft Palate Cran, 2008, 45(3): 232-239.
[11]Hoevenaren IA, Wagenmakers MAEM, Roerink SHPP, et al. Three-dimensional soft tissue analysis of the hand: a novel method to investigate effects of acromegaly[J]. Eur J Plast Surg, 2016, 39(6):429-434.
[12]邵象清. 人体测量手册[M]. 上海: 上海辞书出版社, 1985:164.
[13]Yu A, Yick KL, Ng SP. 2D and 3D anatomical analyses of hand dimensions for custom-made gloves[J]. Appl Ergon, 2013, 44(3): 381-392.
[14]潘俊君, 白隽碹, 张艳宁, 等. 基于三维激光扫描技术的颌面三维测量与直接测量法的比较[J]. 组织工程与重建外科杂志, 2014, 10(1): 14-19.
[15]Kouchi M, Mochimaru M. Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry[J]. Appl Ergon, 2011,42(3): 518-527.
[16]Hoevenaren IA, Verhulst AC, Hameeteman M, et al. Three-dimensional stereophoto- grammetry as an accurate tool for analyzing lymphedema of the hand[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg(Open),2016, 10(1): 40-46.
[17]秦绪佳, 赵海, 张勤锋, 等. 基于边界信息的结构光编解码方法[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2014, 26(6): 879-888.
[18]肖华军, 侯力, 游云霞. 一种基于图像融合的多线结构光立体视觉测量方法[J]. 四川大学学报(工程科学版), 2015, 47(3):154-159.
[19]彭权, 卢荣胜, 穆文娟. 采用双相机结构光三维测量技术解决遮挡问题[J]. 工具技术, 2018, 52(3):122-125.