CT localization study of brachial plexus branches and its clinical significance in Bristow-Latarjet

TAN Zhi-chao, YUAN Sheng-chao, LIN Fu-chun, DU Er-zhu, GUO Jin-hua, YANG Chun

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6) : 646-651.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6) : 646-651. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.06.005

CT localization study of brachial plexus branches and its clinical significance in Bristow-Latarjet

  • TAN Zhi-chao1, YUAN Sheng-chao1, LIN Fu-chun1, DU Er-zhu1, GUO Jin-hua2, YANG Chun2
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To study the CT localization of the brachial plexus in front of the subscapularis muscle and to improve the knowledge of the safe range of Bristow-Latarjet surgical procedures. Methods A total of 16 shoulder cadaver specimens were selected from Guangdong Medical University. Sixteen shoulder specimens were dissected and the position and stroke of the brachial plexus (musculocutaneous nerve, axillary nerve, radial nerve) trunk in front of the subscapularis muscle were marked using the development line. The distance between the musculocutaneous nerves to the anterior edge of the scapular glenoid (at the 2~5 o'clock position of the internal rotation 45° position, the neutral position and the external rotation 45° position) as well as its angular regularity with the line connecting the anterior and posterior margin of thescapular glenoid was measured at the CT level. The resulting data was processed and analyzed statistically. Results  (1) The brachial plexus was in front of the subscapularis muscle and the arrangement of the nerves from the inside to the outside was: the axillary nerve, the radial nerve and the musculocutaneous nerve. (2)The data of musculocutaneous nerve measured in three positions on CT horizontal position were compared among groups: angle comparison showed that there were significant differences between the internal rotation position and neutral position and external rotation position at 2~5 o'clock (all P<0.05). Distance comparison showed that there were significant differences between the external rotation position and neutral position at 2 o'clock and between the internal rotation position (all P<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the neutral position and the internal rotation position (P=0.15). There was statistical difference between the internal rotation position and the neutral position and the external rotation position at 3~5 o'clock (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the 5 o'clock position and the neutral position (P=0.07). Intra-group comparison: the angle of 2 o'clock position of internal rotation was significantly different from that of 3~5 o'clock position (all P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two positions of 3~5 o'clock (all P>0.05). Pearson's analysis showed that the height of the pelvis HL was negatively correlated with the angle of 2-point position of the internal rotation position, positively correlated with the angle of 3-point position, negatively correlated with the distance of 2 o'clock position of the internal rotation position and positively correlated with the distance of 3~5 o'clock position. Conclusions The safe range of the musculocutaneous nerve at the internal rotation 45° position of the shoulder joint is significantly larger than that at the neutral position and the external rotation 45°position. Operation at the internal rotation position is recommended. 

Key words

  / Brachial plexus /  CT localization /  Bristow-Latarjet

Cite this article

Download Citations
TAN Zhi-chao, YUAN Sheng-chao, LIN Fu-chun, DU Er-zhu, GUO Jin-hua, YANG Chun. CT localization study of brachial plexus branches and its clinical significance in Bristow-Latarjet[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2020, 38(6): 646-651 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.06.005

References

[1] Hovelius L, Körner L, Lundberg B, et al. The coracoid transfer for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. Technical aspects of the Bristow-Latarjetprocedure[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1983, 65(7):926-934. 
[2] Frank RM, Gregory B, O'Brien M, et al. Ninety-day complications following the Latarjet procedure[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 28(1):88-94. 
[3]  Gartsman GM, Waggenspack WN, O'Connor DP, et al. Immediate and early complications of the open Latarjet procedure: a retrospective review of a large consecutive case series[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(1): 68-72. 
[4]  Boileau P, Mercier N, Roussanne Y, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure: the development and early results of a safe and reproducible technique[J].Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(11):1434-1450. 
[5] Boileau P, Saliken D, Gendre P, et al. Arthroscopic Latarjet: suture-button fixation is a safe and reliable alternative to screw fixation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35 (4):1050-1061. 
[6] Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, et al. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85(5):878-884. 
[7]  Latarjet M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder[J]. Lyon Chir, 1954, 49(8):994-997. 
[8] Helfet AJ. Coracoid transplantation for recurring dislocation of the shoulder[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1958, 40 (2):198-202. 
[9] May VR Jr. A modified Bristow operation for anterior recurrent dislocation of the shoulder[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970, 52(5):1010-1016. 
[10]吴关, 姜春岩, 鲁谊, 等. 改良关节镜下喙突移位Latarjet手术治疗肩关节前方不稳定[J].北京大学学报( 医学版), 2015, 47(2):321-325. 
[11]钟名金, 陆伟, 柳海峰, 等. 改良关节镜双袢法Latarjet术治疗严重骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1):38-46. 
[12]Kwon YW, Powell KA, Yum JK, et al. Use of three-dimensional computed tomography for the analysis of the glenoid anatomy[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14(1):85-90. 
[13] Nourissat G, Delaroche C, Bouillet B, et al. Optimization of bone-block positioning in the Bristow-Latarjet procedure:a biomechanical study[J].Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2014,100(5):509-513. 
[14]Boileau P, GendreP, Baba M, et al. A guided surgical approach and novel fixation method for arthroscopic Latarjet[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(1):78-89. 

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/