True anastomosis connections of sural neuro-vascular flap and outcomes of the flap for reconstructing soft tissue defect in forefoot

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.016

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 450-454. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.016

TAO Shi-bin, DONG Zhong-gen, WEI Jian-wei, LIU Li-hong, ZHOU Ling-li, LUO Zhao-biao, PENG Ping

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Objective　To discuss the clinical effects of the true anastomosis connections between the sural neuro-vascular flap and outcomes of the flap for reconstructing the soft tissue defect in the forefoot. Methods　Five amputated lower limbs were obtained from 5 patients with recurrent malignant bone tumor in the middle and/or upper femur. After being acquired, these specimens were irrigated and then perfused with a barium sulfate/red latex mixture immediately. The integuments of these limbs were stripped and radiographed. Anatomic observation focused on the true anastomosis connections within the arterial chain around the sural nerve, among the peroneal perforators and between these perforators and the arterial chain. Fifty-two sural neuro-vascular flaps were used to perform the soft tissue defects in the forefoot.　Results　The arterial chain surrounding the sural nerve was linked by true anastomoses from the intermalleolar line to popliteal crease. The distal 2 to 3 peroneal perforators were connected by true anastomoses of their longitudinal branches. Forty-two flaps survived. Partial necrosis occurred in 10 (19.2%) flaps, the remnant defects were successfully performed by secondary suture (n=1), skin grafting (n=8) and local flap transposition (n=1).　Conclusions　The true anastomosis connections within the arterial chain around the sural nerve, among the distal 2 to 3 peroneal perforators and between these perforators and the arterial chain, are the vascular anatomical basis of the sural neuro-vascular flap which survives with greater length. This flap is a better option for reconstruction of the soft tissue defect in the forefoot.

Key words

Surgical flap / 　Sural nerve;　 Forefoot;　 True anastomoses

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

TAO Shi-bin, DONG Zhong-gen, WEI Jian-wei, LIU Li-hong, ZHOU Ling-li, LUO Zhao-biao, PENG Ping. True anastomosis connections of sural neuro-vascular flap and outcomes of the flap for reconstructing soft tissue defect in forefoot[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2020, 38(4): 450-454 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.016

References

[1] Wei JW, Ni JD, Dong ZG, et al. A modified technique to improve reliability of distally based sural fasciocutaneous flap for reconstruction of soft tissue defects longitudinal in distal pretibial region or transverse in heel and ankle[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(4): 753-758.
[2] Perumal R, Bhowmick K, Reka K, et al. Comparison of reverse sural artery flap healing for traumatic injuries above and below the ankle joint[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 58(2): 306-311.
[3] Daar DA, Abdou SA, David JA, et al. Revisiting the reverse sural artery flap in distal lower extremity reconstruction: a systematic review and risk analysis[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2019, 84(4): 463-470.
[4] Chang SM, Li XH, Gu YD. Distally based perforator sural flaps for foot and ankle reconstruction[J].World J Orthop, 2015, 6(3): 322-330.
[5] Lee HI, Ha SH, Yu SO, et al. Reverse sural artery island flap with skin extension along the pedicle[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(3): 470-475.
[6] 赖柏安, 杨胜波. 腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣的解剖学基础和感觉重建临床应用进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(5): 590-592.
[7] Yang D, Morris SF. Reversed sural island flap supplied by the lower septocutaneous perforator of the peroneal artery[J]. Ann Plast Surg, 2002, 49(4): 375-378.
[8] Taylor GI, Chubb DP, Ashton MW. True and 'choke' anastomoses between perforator angiosomes: part i. anatomical location[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013, 132(6): 1447-1456.
[9] Wei JW, Dong ZG, Ni JD, et al. Influence of flap factors on partial necrosis of reverse sural artery flap: a study of 179 consecutive flaps[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2012, 72(3): 744-750.
[10]罗兆彪, 吕国华, 董忠根, 等. 远端蒂腓动脉和胫后动脉的穿支筋膜蒂皮瓣临床应用的比较[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2018, 41(1): 22-26.
[11]Dong ZG, Wei JW, Ni JD, et al. Anterograde-retrograde method for harvest of distally based sural fasciocutaneous flap: report of results from 154 patients[J]. Microsurgery, 2012, 32(8): 611-616.
[12] Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, et al. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009, 124(5): 1529-1544.
[13]张发惠, 宋一平, 林松庆, 等. 腓肠神经营养血管远端蒂皮瓣修复足前部软组织缺损[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2014, 19(1): 46-48.
[14]胡长青, 董启榕. 带腓动脉及其终末穿支的腓肠神经营养血管皮瓣逆行转移修复前足及中足创面21例[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2017, 40(3): 273-276.
[15]Zhu YL, He XQ, Wang Y, et al. Traumatic forefoot reconstructions with free perforator flaps[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2015, 54(6): 1025-1030.