Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 73-77.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.01.015

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical effect of different arthroscopic repairs on rotator cuff injury

CHEN Wei-xiong, XUE Hou-jun, LIU Qing-hua, PAN Lei   

  1. Department of Spinal Joint Surgery, People's Hospital of Sanshui District, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, Foshan 528100, China
  • Online:2020-01-25 Published:2020-02-18

Abstract:  Objective    To compare the clinical effects of arthroscopic total arthroscopy of rotator cuff repair and small incision rotator cuff repair on rotator cuff injury.    Methods    A study of 56 patients with rotator cuff injury treated in Sanshui District People's Hospital from February 2015 to December 2017 was retrospectively divided into two groups: an observation group (27 cases) and a control group (29 cases). The observation group was given arthroscopic rotator cuff repair under arthroscopy, the control group was given arthroscopic assisted small incision rotator cuff repair. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS), the American Elbow Surgeon (ASES), and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder joint function scores, shoulder joint mobility, and shoulder joint muscle strength grading of the two groups patients were compared.   Results    After treatment, the observation group [VAS (1.14±0.28), ASES (91±5), UCLA (34.8±2.7)] was significantly better than the control group [VAS (1.36±0.43), ASES (88±5), UCLA (32.5±3.1)], the difference was statistically significant (t=2.250, 2.544, 2.956, all P<0.05). After treatment, the observation group [internal rotation (67±6)°, external rotation (45 ± 16)°, abduction (133 ± 12)°] was higher than the control group [internal rotation (64±5)°, external rotation (62±6)° and abduction (133±12)°], the difference was statistically significant (t=2.040, 2.027, 2.064, P<0.05); and the observation group [internal rotation (4.62±0.64), external rotation (4.81±0.62), abduction (4.87±0.56)] was superior to the control group [internal rotation (4.26±0.67), external rotation (4.47±0.60), abduction (4.51±0.62)], the difference was statistically significant (t=2.053, 2.085, 2.274, all P<0.05).   Conclusions  Arthroscopic total arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is more effective in the treatment of rotator cuff injury, which has rapid postoperative recovery and high value in promotion and application.

Key words:  , Rotator cuff injury,  Arthroscopy,  Rotator cuff repair,  Clinical efficacy

CLC Number: