Comparative study of solid and subsolid solitary pulmonary nodules

DOU Yu, LU Xing-ru, MA Xian, YIN Liang, ZHANG Hao, YU Qin

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 657-661.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (6) : 657-661. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.06.012

Comparative study of solid and subsolid solitary pulmonary nodules

  • DOU Yu1, LU Xing-ru1, MA Xian2, YIN Liang1, ZHANG Hao1, YU Qin1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective  To explore pathological features of solid and subsolid nodules and identify the radiological characteristic differences between them. Methods A total of 804 patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) were studied retrospectively following surgical resection treatment with a definite postoperative pathology. The SPNs were classified as either solid or subsolid nodules depending on the presence of ground-glass lesion based on thoracic CT scan results. Pathological causes of SPNs were also evaluated and compared between solid and subsolid nodule groups. Demographic (gender and age) and clinical data (smoking and cancer history, the maximum diameter and location of lung nodule) were retrieved to determine difference between solid and subsolid nodules. Results Of the 804 SPN patients, 393 (48.9%) cases were identified as benign SPNs and 411 (51.1%) as malignant, while 544 (67.7%) cases were solid nodules and 260 (32.3%) subsolid nodules. In solid nodules group, 333 (61.2%) cases were diagnosed as benign and 211 (38.8%) cases as malignant. In the subsolid nodules group, 60 (23.1%) cases were benign and 200 (76.9%) cases malignant. The proportion of benign lesions in solid nodules was significantly higher than those in subsolid nodules (P<0.001). In addition, there were significant differences in the subtypes of adenocarcinoma between solid and subsolid nodules (P<0.001). The ratios of female patients, nonsmokers and upper lobe locations were much higher in subsolid nodules than solid nodules.   Conclusion   Lung adenocarcinoma related subsolid nodules but not the solid nodules are more inclined to be developed in female and non-smokers (passive smoker) than male and smokers. In most cases, the nodules are found to be presented in upper lobe of the human lungs.

Key words

Nodule /  CT /   Pathology /  Clinical

Cite this article

Download Citations
DOU Yu, LU Xing-ru, MA Xian, YIN Liang, ZHANG Hao, YU Qin. Comparative study of solid and subsolid solitary pulmonary nodules[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2018, 36(6): 657-661 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.06.012

References

[1]  Patel VK, Naik SK, Naidich DP, et al. A practical algorithmic approach to the diagnosis and management of solitary pulmonary nodules: part 1: radiologic characteristics and imaging modalities[J]. Chest, 2013, 143(3): 825-839.
[2]  崔海燕, 梁振宇, 张达成, 等. 比较纤维支气管镜和经皮肺穿刺活检在肺占位性病变中的诊断价值[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014, 32(3): 361-364.  
[3]  Mets OM, de Jong PA, Scholten ET, et al. Subsolid pulmonary nodule morphology and associated patient characteristics in a routine clinical population[J].Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(2): 689-696.
[4]  McWilliams A, Tammemagi MC, Mayo JR, et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(10): 910-919.
[5] 钱桂生, 余时沧. 肺癌流行病学最新资料与启示[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2012, 35(2): 86-89. 
[6] 徐小雄, 张鹏, 段亮,等. 同济大学附属上海肺科医院20年间手术治疗肺癌患者疾病谱的变化[J]. 中华胸心血管外科杂志, 2014, 30(1): 1-6, 10. 
[7] Lee HJ, Lee CH, Jeong YJ, et al. IASLC/ATS/ERS International Multidisciplinary Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma: novel concepts and radiologic implications[J]. J Thorac Imaging, 2012, 27(6): 340-353.
[8]  Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Thorac Oncol, 2011, 6(2): 244-285.
[9] Gu J, Lu C, Guo J, et al. Prognostic significance of the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification in Chinese patients—a single institution retrospective study of 292 lung adenocarcinoma[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2013, 107(5): 474-480.
[10] Matsunaga T, Suzuki K, Takamochi K, et al. What is the radiological definition of part-solid tumour in lung cancer[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2017, 51(2): 242-247.
[11] Lee PN, Forey BA, Coombs KJ, et al. Time trends in never smokers in the relative frequency of the different histological types of lung cancer, in particular adenocarcinoma[J]. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2016, 74(6): 12-22.
[12] Yun YD, Back JH, Ghang H, et al. Hazard ratio of smoking on lung cancer in Korea according to histological type and gender[J]. Lung, 2016, 194(2): 281-289.
[13] Viñolas N, Garrido P, Isla D, et al. Lung cancer in never-smoking women: a sub-analysis of the Spanish female-specific database WORLD07[J]. Cancer Invest, 2017, 35(5): 358-365. 
[14] Kinsey CM, Estepar RS, Zhao Y, et al. Invasive adenocarcinoma of the lung is associated with the upper lung regions[J]. Lung Cancer, 2014, 84(2): 145-50.
[15] Huang YH, Hsu KH, Tseng JS, et al. Predilection of contralateral upper lung metastasis in upper lobe lung adenocarcinoma patients[J].J Thorac Dis, 2016, 8(1): 86-92.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/