Reconstruction plate-screws parallel to the cartilage surface of the posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum using computed tomography images

WU Hao-jun, HE Yan-xia, CHEN Hang, LIU Yan-zhi,ZHENG Yue-yu,CHEN Guang-hua

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 440-444.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4) : 440-444. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.04.019

Reconstruction plate-screws parallel to the cartilage surface of the posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum using computed tomography images

  • WU Hao-jun, HE Yan-xia, CHEN Hang, LIU Yan-zhi,ZHENG Yue-yu,CHEN Guang-hua
Author information +
History +

Abstract

To study the safe angle and length for screw placement in the posterior wall to avoid intraarticular screw penetration and to provide a theoretical reference for clinical treatment of acetabular fracture. Methods A chart review of posterior wall acetabular fractures treated from 2008 to 2016 yielded the study group that met the inclusion criteria. The study group included 15 consecutive patients who had open reduction of posterior wall fracture and internal fixation with plate and screws. Operative and non-operation notes were reviewed and axial view computed tomography scans were analyzed to determine the modified safe angle and length for screw placement in the posterior wall. Results    All of the above mentioned angles were with respect to the perpendicular of the longitudinal axis of the anterior column without violation of the hip joint away from the acetabular rim,the average width of dangerous zones in the posterior acetabuluar wall was (9.56±1.74)mm in  the operative side and (9.57±1.71) mm in the uninjured side; the average width of safe zones in the posterior acetabuluar wall was (31.67±2.61)mm in the operative side and (31.36±2.75) mm in the uninjured side;the average parallel angle to the cartilage surface of the posterior wall  was (62.33±3.46)° in the operative side and (63.05±3.89)° in the uninjured side, the average length of the screw was (31.67±2.61)mm in the operative side and(31.36±2.75)mm in the uninjured side. There was no statistical difference of data between the posterior wall of acetabulum in the two sides (P>0.05). Conclusion 1/4 region of the posterior acetabuluar wall close to the acetabular rim is the dangerous zone for screw placement, 3/4 region away from the margin of acetabulum is the safe zone.  The screw angle is 60 degrees to be parallel to the quadrilateral plate, and the length of the screw is 30 mm.

Key words

Axial view computed tomography scans /  Posterior acetabular fracture /  Screw /  Internal fixation

Cite this article

Download Citations
WU Hao-jun, HE Yan-xia, CHEN Hang, LIU Yan-zhi,ZHENG Yue-yu,CHEN Guang-hua. Reconstruction plate-screws parallel to the cartilage surface of the posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum using computed tomography images[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2018, 36(4): 440-444 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.04.019

References

[1]  Giordano V, Amaral NP, Franklin CE, et al. Functional outcome after operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum: a 12-month to 5-year follow-up investigation[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2007, 33(5): 520-527.
[2] Davarinos N, Ellanti P, Morris S, et al. Epidemiology of pelvic and acetabular trauma in a Dublin tertiary hospital: a 10-year experience[J]. Ir J Med Sci, 2012,181(2):243-246.
[3] Firoozabadi R,Spitler C,Schlepp C, et al. Determining stability in posterior wall acetabular fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(10):465-469.
[4]  Moed BR, Ajibade DA, Israel H. Computed tomography as a predictor of hip stability status in posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23(1):7-15.
[5] Moed BR. Pearls: How to reduce and fix comminuted posterior acetabular wall fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(1):39-42.
[6] Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis CC, Moed BR. Two-level reconstruction of comminuted posterior-wall fractures ofthe acetabulum[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(4): 503-509.
[7] Ebraheim NA, Waldrop J, Yeasting RA, et al. Danger zone of the acetabulum[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1992, 6(2):146-151.
[8]  宋朝晖,张英泽,潘进社. 髋臼后柱螺钉固定安全性的解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2004,22(2):136-138.
[9]  王先泉, 蔡锦芳, 曹学成, 等.  髋臼后柱钢板内固定技术的解剖学研究 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2009, 47( 15 ): 1182-1184.
[10]Tadros AM,Oxland TR,O'Brien  P. The retroacetabular angle determines the safe angle for screw placement in posterior acetabular fracture fixation[J]. Isrn Orthopedics, 2013,10(3):1-6.
[11]Cimerman M, Kristan A. Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules[J]. Injury, 2007, 38(4):442-449.
[12]Shah SB, Manson TT,Nascone JW, et al. Radiographic determinants of early failure after posterior wall acetabular fracture fixation[J]. Orthopedics, 2016, 39(6):1104-1111.
[13] 庄岩,刘清华,陶凯,等. 髋臼后柱解剖形态的三维重建模型研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2013,33(9):948-953.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/