Finite element analysis of four different kinds of internal fixation for acetabular fracture of T type
ZHANG Yong-qiang,ZHANG Ying,XIA Yuan-jun, XIE Hui-bing, DAI Yuan-yuan, CHEN Ze-peng
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3) : 312-317.
Finite element analysis of four different kinds of internal fixation for acetabular fracture of T type
Objective The anatomical structure of T-type acetabular fracture is very complex with diverse mechanisms of injury, it's difficult to develop a unified surgical gold standard in the clinical treatment. Through the establishment of an effective T-type acetabular fracture of finite element model, the biomechanical stability difference of four different methods of internal fixation was compared. Methods Finite element modeling software was used to build a model of T-type acetabular fracture, and the relevant finite element software was used to establish the following 4 different internal fixation model: retrograde lag screws for two columns (A), the reconstruction plate for anterior column combined with lag screws for posterior column (B), reconstruction plate for posterior column combined with lag screws for anterior column (C) and reconstruction plates for two columns (D). Loading analysis was carried out with the models in a sitting or standing position. Results In standing and sitting positions , the maximum displacement and the mean node displacement of anterior and posterior column fracture lines of T-type acetabular fracture were both A＞B＞C＞D. Conclusion Application of double-column reconstruction plate fixation treatment of T-type acetabular fractures has the best biomechanical stability ,followed by reconstruction plate for posterior column combined with lag screws for anterior column.
Hipbone； Acetabular fracture; Internal fixation / Finite element / Biomechanics
[1] Yildirim AO, Alemdaroglu KB, Yukse HY, et al. Finitedement analysis of the stability of transverse acetabular frxtures in standing and sitting positions by different fixation options[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(suppl2): S29-S35
[2] 王庆贤, 张英泽, 潘进社, 等. 髋臼前柱拉力螺钉内固定的定量解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2004, 22(2):133-135.
[3] 王庆贤, 张英泽, 潘进社, 等. 逆行髋臼后柱拉力螺钉内固定的应用解剖学[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2006, 24(1):36-38.
[4] 黄进成，刘曦明，蔡贤华，等. 前路钛板加方形区螺钉联合后柱螺钉治疗髋臼双柱骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志，2014，22（12）：1104-1110.
[5] 吴淑琴,潘宏侠,裴葆青. 髋臼横断骨折后柱长/短钢板内固定的有限元建模及分析[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2011, 30(1):1-4.
[6] 刘欣伟,闫寒,刘中洋,等. 包含肌肉、韧带组织的骨盆、髋臼3D有限元模型的构建[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2014, 42(4):331-335.
[7] 夏贺欢, 郭跻超,潘进社. 髋臼骨折内固定螺钉置入的应用解剖学研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(6): 587-590.
[8] Ji T，Guo W，Tang XD, et a1．Reconstruction of type II+III pelvic resection with amodular hemipelvic endoprosthesis：a finite element analysis study[J]．Oahop Surg，2010,2(4): 272-277.
[9] Nusser M, Holstieqe J, Kaluscha R, et al. Return to work after fractures of the pelvis and the acetabulum[J]. Z Orthop Unfall, 2015,153(3): 282-288.
[10] 黄进成,张继平,蔡贤华,等. 两种经前路内固定方式治疗复杂髋臼骨折的对比研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(2): 101-105.
[11]Anthony EB, Frank BW, Justin JM, et al. Percutaneous fixation of anterior and Posterior column acetabular fractures[J]. Orthopedics, 2014, 37(10): 675-678.
[12] Puchwein P, Enninghorst N, Sisak K, et al. Percutaneous fixation of acetabular fratures: computer-assisted determination of safe zones, angles and lengths for screw insertion[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2012,132(6):805-811.
[13] 洪华兴,潘志军,陈海啸,等. 髋臼前柱螺钉固定解剖学研究及导向器的设计[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2006, 20(6): 651-654.
[14] 魏星,庄岩,王鹏飞,等. 髋臼后柱数字解剖学研究及解剖钢板的设计[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2013, 10(3): 61-64.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
