Finite element analysis of the anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite /polyamide 66 cage in XLIF/OLIF surgery
PENG Xiang, WANG Wen-jun, YAN Yi-guo, ZUO Jian-hong, ZHANG Jian, YAO Nv-zhao, WANG Cheng, XUE Jing-bo
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5) : 557-562.
Finite element analysis of the anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite /polyamide 66 cage in XLIF/OLIF surgery
Objective To establish an effective L3~5 three-dimensional finite element model, and study the biomechanical attributes of the anatomical nano-hydroxyapatite / polyamide 66 cage in XLIF/OLIF operation. Methods We established the model of normal lumbar spine( L3~5) in order to simulate the XLIF/OLIF operation process by assembling a new anatomic cage and a bullet- liked cage, and the assignment model was imported into software to obtain the final finite element model. Pre-load with axial compression of 400 N and 8 Nm torque was imposed on the model, which caused motion of flexion, extension, bending and rotation of the model. the maximum stress, stress distribution of the two kinds of cage and the ROM of the L4~L5 were analyzed. Results Under 6 different operating conditions, the maximum stress of the bullet-liked cage was 134.83, 79.17, 71.31, 114.96, 76.85, 78.77 MPa, and the maximum stress of the anatomic cage was 56.91, 61.78, 35.82, 52.28, 31.76, and 32.45 MPa, respectively. The stress distribution of anatomic cage was smaller and more dispersed than that of the bullet-liked cage. The ROM of L4~L5 in the two groups was significantly less than that of the normal persons，and the ROM of L4~L5 in anatomic cage group was less than that of the bullet-liked cage group. Conclusions The application of the new anatomic nano-hydroxyapatite / polyamide 66 cage in minimally invasive XLIF/OLIF operation can reduce the maximum stress, circumvent the stress concentration and reduce the activity of vertebral body, proving that it has better mechanical properties.
Anatomic cage / Nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 / XLIF/OLIF / Finite element
[1] Ozgur BM，Aryan HE，Pimenta L， et al． Extreme lateral interbody fusion(XLIF) : a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]．Spine J，2006, 6(4): 435-443．
[2] Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, et al. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients[J]. Asian Spine J, 2012, 6(2):89-97.
[3] 刘列华, 兰阳军, 周强. 腰椎融合手术方式的历史与进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(24):2486-2489.
[4] Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, et al. Anterior reconstruction with nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 cage after thoracic and lumbar corpectomy[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(1):e66-73.
[5] Xiong Y, Ren C, Zhang B, et al. Analyzing the behavior of a porous nano-hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) composite for healing of bone defects[J].Int J Nanomedicine, 2014, 9:485-494.
[6] Schmidt H, Heuer F, Simon U, et al. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2006, 21(4): 337-344.
[7] Tsuang YH, Chiang YF, Hung CY, et al. Comparison of cage application modality in posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior instrumentation--a finite element study[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2009, 31(5):565-570.
[8] Shim CS, Park SW, Lee SH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous stabilizing device, Locker[J]. Spine, 2008, 33(22): E820-827.
[9] Alimi M, Hofstetter CP, Cong GT, et al. Radiological and clinical outcomes following extreme lateral interbody fusion[J].J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 20(6):623-635.
[10]石岩, 崔文岗, 肖德明. 腰椎椎间融合器临床研究进展[J].国际骨科学杂志, 2013, 34(1):45-48.
[11] 杨曦, 宋跃明, 刘立岷, 等. 纳米羟基磷灰石/聚酰胺66椎体支撑体在脊柱前柱手术重建的应用[J].中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(1):20-24.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
