Effecacy analysis of new allograft posterior lumbar fusion cage of anatomical shape in patients with lumbar disc herniation

WANG Xiao-gang, LUO Jian-ping,YANG Bin, WANG Ya-han, CUI Li-yang

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4) : 450-453.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4) : 450-453. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.04.019

Effecacy analysis of new allograft posterior lumbar fusion cage of anatomical shape in patients with lumbar disc herniation

  • WANG Xiao-gang, LUO Jian-ping,YANG Bin, WANG Ya-han, CUI Li-yang
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To discuss the effecacy of new allograft posterior lumbar fusion cage of anatomical shape in patients with lumbar disc herniation. Methods 32 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled and all patients were given treatment of new allograft posterior lumbar fusion cage of anatomical shape. Visual analogue scale(VAS) was applied to evaluate the degree of lumbago and leg pain before and after operation and  Oswestry disability index(ODI)was applied to evaluate the postoperative recovery of patients.The VAS of lumbago and leg pain,ODI score and average intervertebral disc height before and after operation of all patients were compared.    Results    all 32 patients were followed up for a mean follow-up period (9.2± 3.7) months. All patients achieved bony fusion and no serious adverse reactions occurred 6 months after the operation. 6 months after the operation and the last follow-up lumbago and leg pain VAS and ODI score was significantly lower than that before operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). 6 months after the operation and the last follow-up, the average height of the intervertebral space was significantly higher than that before the operation, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The new allograft posterior lumbar fusion cage of anatomical shape can obviously improve the clinical symptoms of patients with lumbar disc prolapse and it is worth popularization and application.

Key words

Lumbar disc prolapse / Bone allograft / Interbody fusion / Anatomy

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Xiao-gang, LUO Jian-ping,YANG Bin, WANG Ya-han, CUI Li-yang. Effecacy analysis of new allograft posterior lumbar fusion cage of anatomical shape in patients with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2016, 34(4): 450-453 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.04.019

References

[1]  何蔚,张桦,何海龙,等. 腰椎单侧及双侧椎弓根螺钉固定椎间融合器的生物力学研究[J]. 解放军医学杂志,2009, 34(4):405-408.
[2]  徐敏,唐汉武,黄承军,等. 后路选择性减压融合内固定术治疗胸腰椎不稳定骨折[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2009, 24(11):1006-1007.
[3]  张绍东,吴小涛,唐天驷.腰椎融合器的现状及发展方向[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(7):443-446.
[4] Becker P, Bretschneider W, Tusehel A, et a1.Life quality after instrumented lumbar fusion in the eiderly[J]. Spine, 2010,35(15):1478-1481.
[5]  Lguchi T, Kanemura A, Kasahara K, et al. Age distribution of three radiologic factors for lumbarinsta-bility;probable aging process of the instability with disc degneneration[J].Spine,2003,28(23):2628-2633.
[6]  李洋,罗飞,刘鹏,等. 新型后路同种异体骨解剖形腰椎融合器的疗效[J]. 实用医学杂志,2014, 30(7):105-108.
[7]  Urrutia J, Mery P, Martinez R, et a1. Cultured autologous bone marrow stem cells inhibit bony fusion in a rabbit model of posterolateral lumbar fusion with autologous bone graft[J].J Clin Neurosci, 2010, 17(4):481-485.
[8]  董健文,戎利民,蔡道章. 单独置入扩张犁椎问融合器再次修复复发性腰椎间盘突出藿建腰椎稳定性[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2008,12(26):5015-5018.
[9] Ebara S, Harada T, Hosono N, et al. Introperative measurement of lumbar spinal instability[J]. Spine,1992,17(3 Suppl):S44-50.
[10]史国栋, 贾连顺, 袁文, 等. 退行性腰椎不稳的诊断与治疗方法(附48例报告)[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2007,28(1):30-32.
[11]曹刚. 椎弓根内固定加植骨治疗腰椎不稳并椎间盘突出症[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2009, 30(6):514-515.
[12]Gob JC, Wong HK, Thambyah A, et a1. Influence of PUF cage size on lumbar spine stability[J]. Spine, 2010, 25(1):35-39.
[13]陈亮, 唐天驷, 杨惠林, 等.后路BAK椎间融合器治疗腰椎滑脱症的并发症分析[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2002, 22(6): 337-342.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/