Anatomy and MRI study of the sacrospinous ligaments of normal pelvis
WANG Yi-ran， CAO Sheng-lu， LING Wei，FENG Kai，PENG Geng，XU Yi-kai，Wang Gang
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3) : 263-267.
Anatomy and MRI study of the sacrospinous ligaments of normal pelvis
Objective To obtain the angle of between the axis of the sacrospinous ligament and the human coronal plane in the human sagittal plane. Methods Eight fresh cadaveric specimen were disserted to find the insertion and the course of sacrospinous ligaments. 3D models were reconstructed from the pelvic CT scan data of 36 normal pelvis, the angle between the axis of the sacrospinous ligament and the human coronal plane in the human sagittal plane were calculated based on 3D coordinate of spatial points. 20 sacrospinous ligaments of 10 volunteers were conducted in the 3D MRI series and observed in the MPR(Multiple Planar Reconstruction) image. The MRI image findings of sacrospinous ligaments were compared among different views. Results The sacrospinous ligament passed from the sacrum to the ischial spine. A board range of insertion on the sacrococcygeal region were observed. We found in the CT data measurements that there was no significant differences between the left and the right sides in both genders (P>0.05). The differences between male and female were of no statistical significance (P>0.05). The mean angle of the 72 sides was (61.32±8.71)°. The mean angle measured on MRI data was （57.53±9.50）°. There was no statistical significant differences between the CT and MRI measurement results (P>0.05). We compared the MR imaging at the position of (60±5)° oblique coronal plane and the 3 normal planes and found that the ligaments can better be observed in oblique coronal plane (P<0.05). Conclusions The sacrospinous ligaments were well shown in (60.0±5)° oblique coronal plane.
Pelvic / Sacroiliac joints / Sacrospinous ligaments / 3D Magnetic resonance imaging
[1] Grotz MR, Allami MK, Harwood P, et al. Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concepts of management and outcome[J]. Injury, 2005,36(1):1-13.
[2] Guthrie HC, Owens RW, Bircher MD. Fractures of the pelvis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2010, 92(11):1481-1488.
[3] 潘进社, 康红军, 张英泽, 等. 骨盆韧带损伤对骶髂关节稳定性影响的生物力学研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2008,10(1):68-71.
[4] Steinke H, Hammer N, Slowik V, et al. Novel insights into the sacroiliac joint ligaments[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010,35(3):257-263.
[5] Tile M, Helfet D, Kellam J. 骨盆与髓臼骨折[M]. 邱贵兴,主译.第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2006:11-19.
[6] Edeiken-Monroe BS, Browner BD, Jackson H. The role of standard roentgenograms in the evaluation of instability of pelvic ring disruption[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1989, (240):63-76.
[7] Gansslen A, Pohlemann T, Paul C, et al. Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries[J]. Injury, 1996, 27(Suppl 1):A13-A20.
[8] Garcia DSL, de Miguel CJ, Aguilera DHL, et al. MR imaging-based assessment of the female pelvic floor[J]. Radiographics, 2014,34(5):1417-1439.
[9] Gary JL, Mulligan M, Banagan K, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of ligamentous injury in the pelvis: a prospective case-controlled study[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2014,28(1):41-47.
[10]Le Blanche AF, Mabi C, Bigot JM, et al. The sacroiliac joint: anatomical study in the coronal plane and MR correlation[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 1996, 18(3):215-220.
[11]徐松, 罗明英, 邓鹏程, 等. 骶结节韧带和骶棘韧带的解剖定位研究[J]. 解剖学研究, 2010, 32(5):351-353.
[12]Hammer N, Steinke H, Slowik V, et al. The sacrotuberous and the sacrospinous ligament--a virtual reconstruction[J]. Ann Anat, 2009,191(4):417-425.
[13]易正湘, 仲炜, 刘建滨, 等. 磁共振Dixon法在膝关节骨损伤中的应用价值[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2004, 6(4):544-545.
[14]邓军, 梁碧玲, 陈健宇, 等. 前交叉韧带损伤的3D MRI诊断价值[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2008, 24(6):814-817.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
