The clinical significance of residual preservation in the operation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its postoperative recovery
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5) : 584-587.
The clinical significance of residual preservation in the operation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and its postoperative recovery
Objective According to the analysis of the knee function and the stability, the postoperative efficacy of the anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction with residual preservation was evaluated and the clinic role of residual preservation was explored. Methods From January 2011 to January 2013,78 cases of patients diagnosed with the anterior cruciate ligament rupture underwent ACL reconstruction with allogeneic hamstring tendons, and all patients were followed up for at least 12 months. Of the 78 cases , there were 51 males and 27 females with an average age of 29.2 years old. The average interval from injury tosurgery was 3 months; All 78 cases of patients had complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, including 30 cases of body rupture, 44 cases of femoral attachment point rupture and 4 cases of tibial attachment point rupture. Surgery was performed in a way that could retain the remaining stump as much as possible. The postoperative knee function and stability were followed up for a period of 12~35 months with an average of 25 months. The clinic effects were evaluated according to the physical examination. Results Lachmantest, anterior drawer test and pivot shift test were negative in 76 patients. Compared to preoperative data, postoperative Lysholmscores, Tegnerscores and IKDC scores were significantly improved（P<0.05）. Conclusion Reserved stump had important significance in ACL reconstruction operation. ACL reconstruction operation with it could achieve a good clinical efficacy.
Knee / Residual preservation / Anterior cruciate ligament / Reconstruction
[1] Shelbourne KD, Nitz P. Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 1990, 18(3):292-299.
[2] Veltri DM. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Clin Sports Med, 1997, 16(1):123-144.
[3] Piefer JW, Pflugner TR, Hwang MD, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament femoral footprint anatomy: systematic review of the 21st century literature[J]. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(6):872-881.
[4] 孔颖，张元民，赵晓伟. 关节镜下保留残端四股腘绳肌腱单束重建后交叉韧带疗效观察[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2013, 27(09):1037-1040.
[5] Unterhauser FN, Bail HJ, Hoher J, et al. Endoligamentous revascularization of an anterior cruciate ligament graft[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2003(414):276-288.
[6] Gohil S, Annear PO, Breidahl W. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous double hamstrings: a comparison of standard versus minimal debridement techniques using MRI to assess revascularisation. A randomised prospective study with a one-year follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2007, 89(9):1165-1171.
[7] Tsuda E, Okamura Y, Otsuka H, et al. Direct evidence of the anterior cruciate ligament-hamstring reflex arc in humans[J]. Am J Sports Med,2001, 29(1):83-87.
[8] Ochi M, Iwasa J, Uchio Y, et al. Induction of somatosensory evoked potentials by mechanical stimulation in reconstructed anterior cruciate ligaments[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002, 84(5):761-766.
[9] Georgoulis AD, Pappa L, Moebius U, et al. The presence of proprioceptive mechanoreceptors in the remnants of the ruptured ACL as a possible source of re-innervation of the ACL autograft[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2001, 9(6):364-368.
[10] Fu FH, Shen W, Starman JS, et al. Primary anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a preliminary 2-year prospective study[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(7):1263-1274.
[11] Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, et al. Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(7):771-778.
[12] Hollis R, West H, Greis P, et al. Autologous bone effects on femoral tunnel widening in hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. J Knee Surg, 2009, 22(2):114-119.
[13] Junkin DJ, Johnson DL. ACL tibial remnant, to save or not[J]？Orthopedics, 2008, 31(2):154-159.
[14] Lee BI, Kwon SW, Kim JB, et al. Comparison of clinical results according to amount of preserved remnant in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring graft[J]. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(5):560-568.
[15] Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy. A minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2000, 120(3-4):128-133.
[16] Colombet P, Robinson J, Jambou S, et al. Two-bundle, four-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2006, 14(7):629-636.
[17] Yagi M, Wong E K, Kanamori A, et al. Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2002, 30(5):660-666.
[18] Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007,23(6):618-628.
[19] Ferretti A, Monaco E, Labianca L, et al. Double bundle or single bundle plus extra-articular tenodesis in ACL reconstruction? A CAOS study[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2008, 16(1):98.
[20] 陆伟，王大平，肖德明. 前交叉韧带重建股骨足迹精确定位的解剖与临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2011, 29(05):513-516.
[21] Wang J, Ao Y. Analysis of different kinds of cyclops lesions with or without extension loss[J]. Arthroscopy, 2009, 25(6):626-631.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
