A study on the accuracy of humeral head retroversion angle measured by different methods used in clinical practice

BO Zhao-Xun, ZHANG Zhi-Cheng, CUI Yan, SUN Chao, ZHANG Hong-Xin

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 567-570.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 567-570. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.05.014

A study on the accuracy of humeral head retroversion angle measured by different methods used in clinical practice

  • PAN Zhao-xun1, ZHANG Zhi-cheng2, CUI Yan1, SUN Chao1, ZHANG Hong-xin1
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To verify the accuracy of humeral head retroversion angle with  two different methods commonly used in clinical practice and assess the value in the shoulder arthroplasty. Methods 20 dry humerus specimens (bones with closed growth plates and no signs of degenerative or post-traumatic alterations. No information about sex or age) were scanned with 64 slice spiral CT, using two methods-the traditional two-dimensional CT measurement and a simple two-dimensional CT measurement, to measure the humeral head retroversion angle; then use the anatomical measurement to obtain the standard data; At last, the three groups data on humeral head retroversion angle were statistically analyzed. Results The angle of retroversion was (32.1±13.9)° using  traditional two-dimensional CT method, (30.2±14.3)° using the simple two-dimensional CT method, and (32.1±13.6)° using anatomical dissection. There was no statistical difference between groups by statistics (P>0.05). Conclusion Both methods can assess the humeral head retroversion angle very accurately, but the new two-dimensional CT method is relatively simpler, faster, more intuitive and practical. The Humeral head retroversion angle has great individual differences, and it is of great significance to accurately assess its value before the individually surgery.

Key words

Humeral head retroversion angle / Measurement / Accuracy / Shoulder arthroplasty

Cite this article

Download Citations
BO Zhao-Xun, ZHANG Zhi-Cheng, CUI Yan, SUN Chao, ZHANG Hong-Xin. A study on the accuracy of humeral head retroversion angle measured by different methods used in clinical practice[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2014, 32(5): 567-570 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.05.014

References


[1]  赵春明, 范卫民, 王青, 等. 肱骨近端解剖测量在人工肩关节置换中的意义
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2008, 26(5):497-499.

[2]  潘昭勋, 杨晓明, 孙超.肱骨头扭转角度测量与人工肩关节置换
[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(39):7374-7376.

[3]  李建武, 王臻, 宦怡, 等. 成人肱骨形态学三维CT测量
[J].中国解剖与临床, 2001, 6(1):22-24.

[4]  李锦青, 王健. 唐康来. 多层螺旋CT二维法测量肱骨头扭转角探讨
[J].现代生物医学进展,2008, 8(9):1684-1687.

[5]  李建武, 王臻, 宦怡, 等. 国人肱骨形态学三维CT分析
[J].第四军医大学学报, 2002,23(16):1458-1460.

[6]  Cofield RH. Degenerative and arthritic problems of gleno-humeral joint
[M],Rockwood CA Jr, Matsen FA, editors. The shoulder.Philadelphia.WB Saunders,1990:678-749.

[7]  Cofield RH. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis
[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1984,66(6):899-906.

[8]  Cofield RH. Unconstrained total should prosthesis
[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1983,173:87-108.

[9]  Neer CS, Watson KC, Santon FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement
[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1982, 64(3):319-337.

[10]Ovesen J, Soibierg JO, Sneppen O. A humeral head cutting guide: instrument to secure humeral component retroversion in shoulder joint arthroplasty
[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1956, (216):193-194.

[11]罗滨.肱骨远端解剖参数相关性分析与假体个体化设计
[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2007,25(4):409-412.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/