Contrast analysis and microdissection of the exposure of the jugular foramen region via different surgical approaches
SUN Shou-Yuan, BO E-Wen, LIN Jun, GAO Dun-Wei, ZHANG Hai-Lin, TANG Bo
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 519-522.
Contrast analysis and microdissection of the exposure of the jugular foramen region via different surgical approaches
Objective To investigate the difference of the extent and structure of the foramen jugulare region from a far lateral inferior suboccipital approach, post aur presigmoid approach, improved post aur head and neck approach. Methods Six emblamed adult cadaveric heads were randomally and equally assigned to three groups (group A、B、and C). Jugular foramen operative approach was simulated under high power microscope. The far lateral inferior suboccipital approach was applied to A, the post aur presigmoid approach was applied to B, the improved post aur head and neck approach was applied to C to proceed microdissection studies;exposed structure and scope were compared among the above-mentioned surgical approaches. Result The far lateral inferior suboccipital approach was better for jugular foramen area to exposeintracranial structures, post aur presigmoid approach was better to expose internal structures in the jugular foramen、tympanum、mastoid air cell and structures around cervical artery sheath; improved post aur head and neck approach was better for exposure of extracranial-intracranial(EC-IC) structures through multiple angles such as rear, outside, above and below. Conclusion The exposure range and structures of jugular foramen area vary in different surgical approaches. Improved post aur head and neck approach with its multiple angles was better at exposure of intracranial and extracranial structures, so that total resecction of tumor can be achieved.
Jugular foramen region / Surgical approach / Microdissection / Exposure structure
[1] Rhoton AL Jr. Jugular foramen
[J]. Neurosurgery, 2000, 47(3 suppl): S267-285.
[2] Salas E, Sekhar LN, Ziyal IM, et al. Variations of the extremelateral craniocervical approach: anatomical study and clinical analysia of 69 patients
[J]. J Neurosurg, 1999, 90(2 suppl): 206-219.
[3] 刘庆, 于春江, 袁贤瑞, 等. 不同入路显露颈静脉孔区的定量研究
[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2007, 45(8): 558-561.
[4] 王向宇, 侯文仲, 姜晓丹. 改良颈静脉孔区手术入路的显微解剖学研究
[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2008, 24(12): 903-905.
[5] 王洪正, 戴黎萌, 许燕球, 等. 远外侧经枕髁经颈静脉结节手术入路的量化分析
[J]. 中华神经医学杂志, 2006, 5(5): 483-485.
[6] Fisch U,Pillsbury HC. Infratemporal fossa approach to lesions in the temporal bone and base of the skull
[J]. Arch Otolaryngol,1979,105(5):99-107.
[7] 王勇利,蒋卫红,章华,等. 不同手术入路对颈静脉孔区显露程度的比较研究及其临床应用价值探讨
[J]. 中国耳鼻喉颅底外科杂志,2010,16(1):1-6.
[8] 张明广, 徐启武, 鲍伟民, 等. 改良经颈静脉孔入路的显微解剖研究
[J].中华神经外科杂志, 2003, 19(6): 115-118.
[9] Links Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, et al. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation
[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 2008, 13(12): 273-280.
[10] Park CK, Jung HW, Kim JE, et al. The selection of the optimal therapeutic strategy for petroclival meningiomas
[J]. Surg Neurol, 2006, 66(9): 160-165.
[11] 潘亚文, 袁贤瑞, 刘庆, 等. 经乙状窦后入路对桥小脑角区的显露及损伤程度的评价
[J].中华神经外科疾病研究杂志, 2008,7(2):136-140.
[12] 刘庆, 袁贤瑞, 潘亚文, 等. 颈静脉孔区的显微解剖及定位标志研究
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2004, 22(3): 240-243.
[13] 黄军, 袁贤瑞, 奚健, 等. 颈静脉孔的显微外科解剖学研究
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2002, 20(2): 203-205.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |