Comparation of clinical effect of two methods for treating distal radius fracture involving articular surface
HUANG Mei-Jun, LI Quan-Meng, LIANG Zhi-Jian, TANG Yang-Wei, KONG Xiang-Quan
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2014, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4) : 497-499.
Comparation of clinical effect of two methods for treating distal radius fracture involving articular surface
Objective To compare clinical effect of anatomical locking plate fixation and ordinary steel fixation for treating distal radius fracture involving articular surface. Methods From June 2010 to September 2013，a total of 96 cases of patients who suffered distal radius fracture involving articular surface in our hospital were divided into the control group and the observation group according to the degree of fracture, with 50 patients in the control group, 46 patients in the observation group. Patients in the observation group was treated by anatomical locking plate fixation, while patients in the control group was treated by ordinary steel fixation. Time for beginning of postoperative rehabilitation, fracture healing time and clinical effect of the two groups were compared. Results Time for beginning of postoperative rehabilitation in the observation group was significantly earlier than that of the control group (1.22±0.71 d vs 2.34±1.07 d, P<0.05). Fracture healing time of observation group was significantly shorter than that of control group( 66.67±12.43 d vs 74.47±15.63 d, P<0.05). The excellent-good rate of observation group (94.0%) was higher than that of control group (71.7%), the difference being statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with ordinary steel fixation, anatomical locking plate was more reliable in fixation and had better clinical result on patients sustain distal radius fracture involving articular surface.
Internal fixation / Locking plate / Ordinary steel / Distal radius fracture
[1] Tosti R, Ilyas AM. Prospective evaluation of pronator quadratus repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures
[J]. J Hand Surg, 2013, 38(9): 1678-1684.
[2] 孙强, 董新利, 郑加法. T形锁定钢板联合克氏针治疗老年桡骨远端C型骨折
[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2012, 28(20): 3491-3492.
[3] 刘宁, 赵承斌. 陈旧性桡骨远端骨折的治疗进展
[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2011, 19(4): 299-301.
[4] 杨能, 何爱咏. 桡骨远端骨折的研究进展
[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2012, 16(1): 73-75.
[5] 刘春永. 桡骨远端骨折的治疗进展
[J]. 河北联合大学学报(医学版), 2013, 15(5): 641-643.
[6] 马立峰, 于浩淼, 杨稳, 等. 桡骨远端骨折对腕关节功能影响的研究进展
[J]. 医学综述, 2011, 17(4): 559-561.
[7] 田治标, 俞益火. 桡骨远端骨折临床治疗的研究进展
[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2013, 10(18): 2475-2476.
[8] 邹健, 卢国樑, 冯永洪, 等. T形锁定钢板治疗桡骨远端骨折的疗效
[J]. 实用临床医学, 2013, 14(1): 60-63.
[9] 陈海东, 王培民, 范竞. 桡骨远端骨折外固定治疗进展
[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2011, 30(6): 941-944.
[10] 张林林, 胡孔足, 卜海富. 桡骨远端骨折治疗进展
[J]. 临床骨科杂志, 2012, 15(2): 209-213.
[11] 朱小虎, 周临东, 张惠法, 等. 桡骨远端骨折治疗进展
[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2012, 21(4): 453-454.
[12] 郭东辉, 石国君, 侯秀秀, 等. 锁定钢板在挠骨远端不稳定骨折中的应用
[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2011, 27(2): 4172.
[13] 陈浩宇, 高峻青, 李向明, 等. 微创治疗桡骨远端骨折安全进针区域的解剖学研究
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2011, 29(3): 264-267.
[14] 杨焕友, 王斌, 李浩, 等. 尺骨茎突解剖特点与骨折分型及治疗方法
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(5): 564-567.
[15] 黄雪萍, 刘洁珍, 谢青梅, 等. 锁定加压接骨板内固定与早期功能训练对桡骨远端骨折术后腕关节功能康复的影响
[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2013, 29(14): 2343-2345.
[16] 林振恩, 魏艳珍. 新型蝶形锁定加压钢板治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析
[J]. 中华关节外科杂志, 2011, 5(4): 513-517.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
