关节镜下自体四股腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带重建术后疗效及影响因素

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.5.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的通过关节镜下应用自体四股腘绳肌腱（semitendinosus/gracilis，ST/G）前交叉韧带(anterior cruciate ligament, ACL)重建术治疗ACL损伤，探讨采用不同手术方式和不同康复训练方式术后的疗效对比及其影响因素。方法回顾性分析自2017年1月至2018年3月期间本院收治的ACL损伤患者共80例（80膝），按照手术方式及康复训练方式不同分为4组，每组20例（20膝），包括保残专业康复组，保残常规康复组，非保残专业康复组，非保残常规康复组。比较末次随访时4组膝关节功能评分、稳定性试验和本体感觉测量结果。结果术后患者随访时间均为12个月。4组术后末次随访时Lysholm和IKDC评分均较术前明显增高（P<0.001），且四组间有显著性差异（P<0.001）。术后四组患侧与健侧位置觉差异对比均有统计学意义（P<0.001）。基于Lysholm、IKDC评分中末次随访与术前的差值增量、患侧与健侧位置觉差异为因变量，以手术方式和康复训练方式为自变量行双因素方差分析，两自变量对膝关节功能评分和本体感觉恢复影响具有显著性（P<0.001），并且保残组两评分增量显著高于非保残组（P<0.001），专业康复组两评分增量显著高于常规康复组（P<0.001），而保残组位置觉差异显著低于非保残组（P<0.001），专业康复组位置觉差异显著低于常规康复组（P<0.001）。结论关节镜下自体四股ST/G保留下止点残端重建术是治疗ACL损伤的理想手术方案，术后实施分时段、个体化专业运动疗法康复，能够促进膝关节功能和本体感觉恢复，有助于患者尽早康复和重返运动。

关键词: 关节镜； , , 前交叉韧带重建； , , 手术方式； , , 康复训练方式； , , 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of different surgical methods and different rehabilitation training methods in the treatment of ACL injury by arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon (ST/G). Methods From January 2017 to March 2018, 80 patients (80 knees) with ACL injury in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into four groups according to the operation and rehabilitation training methods, 20 cases in each group (20 knees), including a remnant-preserving professional rehabilitation group, a remnant-preserving routine rehabilitation group, a remnant-eliminating professional rehabilitation group and a remnant-eliminating routine rehabilitation group. The knee function score, stability test and proprioception measurement results of the four groups at the last follow-up were compared. Results All patients were followed up for 12 months. The Lysholm and IKDC scores of the four groups at the last follow-up were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.001), and there were significant differences among the four groups (P<0.001). There were significant differences in position perception between the affected side and the healthy side in the four groups after operation (P<0.001). Based on Lysholm and IKDC scores, the increment of difference between the last follow-up and preoperative, the difference of position perception between the affected side and the healthy side were the dependent variables, and the operation mode and rehabilitation training mode were the independent variables for two-way ANOVA. The two independent variables had significant effects on knee function score and proprioception recovery (P<0.001). In addition, the increment of two scores in the remnant-preserving group was significantly higher than that in the remnant-eliminating group (P<0.001). The increment of two scores in the professional rehabilitation group was significantly higher than that in the routine rehabilitation group (P<0.001). The difference of position sense in the remnant-preserving group was significantly lower than that in the remnant-eliminating group (P<0.001), and the difference of position sense in the professional rehabilitation group was significantly lower than that in the routine rehabilitation group (P<0.001). Conclusions Arthroscopic reconstruction preserving the tibial remnant with four strand ST/G is an ideal surgical plan for the treatment of ACL injury. Postoperative rehabilitation of segmented and individualized professional kinesiotherapy can promote the recovery of knee function and proprioception, and can help patients recover and return to exercise as soon as possible.

Key words: Arthroscopy; , , Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; , Operation method, Rehabilitation training mode; , Influencing factors

中图分类号:

R687.4

尹帅, 刘媛媛, 庞胤, 隋月林, 张昕悦, 李冰, 陈亚军. 关节镜下自体四股腘绳肌腱前交叉韧带重建术后疗效及影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(5): 592-598.

Yin Shuai , Liu Yuanyuan , Pang Yin , Sui Yuelin, Zhang Xinyue, Li Bing, Chen Yajun. Postoperative effect and influencing factors of the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with four hamstring tendon autograft under arthroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(5): 592-598.

参考文献 19

[1]	崔巍, 曲颖, 李佳南, 等. 前交叉韧带重建四股腘绳肌腱移植物的测量[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 28(16): 1497-1500. DOI:10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2020.16.14.
[2]	Cengiz Ö, Demir N, Dırvar F. Effects of graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: midterm functional results[J]. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul, 2019, 53(4): 419-425. DOI: 10.14744/SEMB.2018.23281.
[3]	Jiahao Zhang, Yong Ma, Chaonan Pang, et al. No differences in clinical outcomes and graft healing between anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement after single bundle ACL reconstruction[J]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020, DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06206-y.
[4]	Sabat D, Sehrawat R, Kumar V. A Percutaneous technique to reposition the cortical button of adjustable-loop devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2019, 8(11): e1273-e1276. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2019.06.021.
[5]	饶根云, 谢友军, 雷祥进. 自体腓骨长肌腱膝前交叉韧带单束重建的近期疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2019, 34(4), 419-421. DOI:10.7531/j.issn.1672-9935.2019.04.032.
[6]	敬沛嘉, 王谦, 李箭. 系统康复训练对运动爱好者前交叉韧带重建术后运动功能恢复的临床疗效. 华西医学, 2018, 33(9): 1134-1137. DOI:10.7507/1002-0179.201711160.
[7]	吴宇峰，陈亮，高大伟，等．4种物理检查方法在前交叉韧带完全断裂诊断中的应用价值[J]．上海交通大学学报(医学版)，2017，37(11):1512-1516．DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2017.11.011.
[8]	Edward C Cheung, Marcus DiLallo, Brian T Feeley, et al. Osteoarthritis and ACL Reconstruction-Myths and Risks[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2020, 13(1): 115-122. DOI:10.1007/s12178-019-09596-w.
[9]	黄媛霞, 段永壮, 陶金刚, 等. 关节镜下保留残端与非保残重建前交叉韧带的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 564-566. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.05.017.
[10]	Al-Bluwi MT, Azam MQ, Sadat-Alim. The effect of bone growth factor in the tendon to bone healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An experimental study in rabbits[J]. Int J Appl Basic Med Res, 2016, 6(1): 23-27. DOI: 10.4103/2229-516X.174004.
[11]	Bertrand SC, Adana S, Maxime C, et al. Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Is Associated With Significantly Reduced ACL Graft Rupture Rates at a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years: A Prospective Comparative Study of 502 Patients From the SANTI Study Group[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(7): 1547-1557. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516686057.
[12]	宋恩鸿, 邹国耀, 刘瑞端, 等. 不同定位方法对单束前交叉韧带重建术中股骨隧道的影响[J].微创医学, 2019，14(1): 31-34. DOI:10.11864/j.issn.1673.2019.01.09.
[13]	Takanori Iriuchishima, Bunsei Goto. Systematic Review of Surgical Technique and Tunnel Target Points and Placement in Anatomical Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction[J]. J Knee Surg, 2020, DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710521. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1710521.
[14]	Byung-lll Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Byung Woong Jang, et al. Preservation of the Tibial Remnant in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction May Improve Postoperative Proprioceptive Function[J]. Orthopedics. 2020, 43(4): e231-e236. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20200404-04.
[15]	Lei Yan, Jiaojiao Li, yuanyuan Zhu, et al. Interference screws are more likely to perform better than cortical button and cross-pin fixation for hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06231-x. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06231-x.
[16]	闫丹丹，许岩，顾珊菱, 等. 快速康复护理应用于前交叉韧带重建术后的效果观察[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(6): 1279-1281. DOI:10.13463/j.cnki.cczyy.2020.06.053.
[17]	李顺昌, 伏兰, 郭小川, 等. 运动疗法对前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节功能恢复的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2019, 19(9): 1086-1092. DOI：10.7507/1672-2531.201902049.
[18]	Angela HS, Jacob JC, Ryan Z, et al. Athletes with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were slower to meet rehabilitation milestones and return-to-sport criteria than athletes with hamstring tendon autograft or soft tissue allograft: secondary analysis from the ACL-SPORTS trial[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2020, 50(5): 259-266. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9111.
[19]	Von Essen C, McCallum S, Barenius B, et al. Acute reconstruction results in less sick-leave days and as such fewer indirect costs to the individual and society compared to delayed reconstruction for ACL injuries[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(7): 2044-2052. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05397-3.